Tuesday, 18 December 2007

EU Regional Logos

Logos are powerful tools, upon which tens of thousands are spent. What is noticable about the various EU sponsored "regional" agencies in England is that all the logos have one important thing missing from them - namely, ANY indication that they are English.

Let's start off the the portal site for all the regional agencies , which is over here. It's logo is this



England, with a history going back thousands of years, reduced to an indistinct blue/grey blob. How quaint.

Now lets go through each of the regions. Heres the East of England Regional Development Agency logo, which is a green/white Stalinist imprint that conveys nothing of the East of Englands maritime history.




Associated with EEDA is the East of England Observatory who's logo is the following:



The circle doodle in that logo reminds me of the logo of Common Purpose


The South West RDA has this logo:


The rich, ancient history of the Devon and Cornwall reduced to a pixellated mess.

The North West RDA is even worse, with the whole region behind reduced to a strange 5 pixel corner icon thing.



The West Midlands RDA, now rebranded as Advantage West Midlands has a big stylised A in its logo. As to any indication that it's based in England, well, no. There isn't any.



The North East RDA has a similar meme, after being rebranded as One North East. "One" is a collective term ("acting as one") , so it's safe to assume that this lot are probably infested with Common Purpose.


One North East has a curious Christmas e-card which , despite the references to castles, and Roman ruins, gives no indication of it being from England. It's interesting to note that in the e-card, one of the castles is flying a white flag instead of the flag of St George.

The Yorkshire Forward RDA has this curious swastika like logo




Viking re-enactment, with a shield adorned with a white Nordic swastika that is curiously close to the Yorkshire Forward logo


Both the East Midlands and South East manage to infuse at least a small dose of Britishness in their logos with incorporation of the red , white and blue colours.





But the London RDA go and spoil it all with their totally anonymous, bland logo


Now, you might say that this is a trivial post, but you have to bear in mind that logos don't come out of thin air. They are tendered for, designed, cost thousands, if not tens of thousands, and have to be approved and signed off. And these are the logos these RDAs are using in their dealings with the European Union. For if an RDA like the South West one for example, can completely ignore Cornish culture (for example), what does that tell you abou the people running that RDA. People who have never been elected, and yet have embassies in Brussels and liase with the EU and channel hundreds of millions of taxpayers money. And all completely unaccountable to the electorate.


9 comments:

wonkotsane said...

I'd rather no nationalistic branding than the pathetic conflation of English and British in the EMDA and SEEDA logos. England and Britain are two different things.

I've been campaigning against the regional quangocracy in the West Midlands euroregion for a while now - West Midlands NO!. We just shafted the local City Region project, you might find it ammusing.

John Trenchard said...

yeah. that SEEDA one is very strange. i wonder why they picked that patische of the Union flag?

and thats an interesting website you got there - good to know that there are people like you out there fighting undemocratic quangos.

Cassandra said...

Hi, With regard to the curious e-card: merry Christmas via season's greetings now reduced to regional greetings, the story board up to the very end is unrelated to Christmas but shows only winter scapes, finally there's the snowman who has some passions toward the pagan symbols of Christmas, but no relation whatsover with the Christian roots.
As far the swastika, I suppose that is Celtic inspired, vaguely.
You are right about the logos, specially since CP c.s. themselves are so obsessed with symbolism.
Keep up the good work!

John Trenchard said...

come to think of it, the Yorkshire swastika symbol looks sort of like a Viking runic symbol.

wonkotsane said...

The swastika is actually a Hindu symbol of peace. It was flipped over so the "ticks" pointed the other way and used by the Nazi's for some reason that escapes me at the moment.

John Trenchard said...

thats explainable - the Nazis adopted the swastika because of their doctrine of the Aryan race, which they believed originated in India, and then migrated westwards to Europe.

The Indian "caste" system was seen as a model for the Nazis of a society of "racial purity".

However, the swastika was already in use by the German Volkisch nationalist movements, such as the Thule Society.

There's also a link to Viking Nordic Swastika , which fitted into the whole "Wagner/Odin/Thor" ideology of especially the S.S. and the uber-Nazis.

Heres a pic of a Viking re-enactment showing a white nordic swastika on a shield. It looks curiously close to that Yorkshire Forward logo.

Toque said...

As a denizen of the South East I have sent the following to SEERA.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Can you tell me why the SEEDA has a stylised Union Flag as part of its logo when it is an English region, and when the Scots and Welsh have their own national administrations?

Inexplicably the Irish Cross of St Patrick appears to feature quite prominently. Why is this?

John Trenchard said...

interesting email that you've wrote, with very good points.


if you get a reply , please do post the response here.

Sarah-Jane said...

dont you think the Yorkshire thing might be a graphicised white rose - the symbol one would automatically associate with Yorkshire?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Flag_of_Yorkshire.jpg

you see what you want to see I guess.